Updates from August, 2009

  • Long Term Investing with Options

    Jordan Weir 4:21 pm on August 19, 2009 | 0 Permalink
    Tags: , long term investing, option trading strategy, , Stock Option Strategy, stock options, Stock trading strategy,

    Many traders view options as only a short term trading strategy. The idea of a highly leveraged bet with the potential to make big bucks quickly appeals to the gambler inside all of us. Just like a card counting black-jack player, options strategies can be used to make consistent short term gains, provided the user is careful, and knows what they’re doing. But while options are usually employed solely by that group of high-risk, high-reward traders, they actually have enormous benefits that tend to go unnoticed by many a long term investor.

    The stock option strategy I’m about to unveil is rarely used. Amazingly, I’ve only briefly heard mention of them on little known websites, and even then, not in enough detail to give an example. So here it is, what I believe may be the biggest secret kept from long term investors on wall street. The stock option strategy for the long term investor.

    The strategy is a vertical option spread, using leap options. How this strategy works is you buy one option, while simultaneously selling another option for the same month, but at a different strike price. While XYZ is usually my generic ticker, I will use a real company in this case. Keep in mind, this is NOT a recommendation. In actuality, it would probably be a bad idea to invest in the example I’m about to give. Its just an example. Yet to get realistic prices for this strategy, it may be helpful to use a actual company.

    note:I wrote this part of the article about a short time ago, prices may not be 100% current. at this time GE is currently at 10.41 per share. In this example, let us talk the January 2011 options, giving GE plenty of time to go the way we think it will. So if you thought GE was an excellent long term buy, it would be within reason to think it’s going to at least $20 per share by that point. By January 2011, many experts expect the recession to be over, and that single development alone should lead to a substantially higher stock price.

    Buy one option to start the vertical spread, and sell a second option at a higher price to complete it. With our price target of around $20, and with the current price, 10.41, I would buy the 12.50 strike call option, and sell the 17.50 strike call option. The 12.50 option can be bought for 2.71 at the moment, while the 17.50 can be sold for 1.40, giving us an total cost of 1.31 per share for the vertical spread.

    Now lets examine this trade for a second. If General Electric is trading below 12.50 on the January 2011 expiration, both options expire worthless, and the 1.31 per option spread invested is gone. On the other hand, if General Electric is trading above 17.50, then the 12.50 option will be worth exactly $5.00 more then the 17.50 option, and so the position is worth $5.00 per share. If its between 12.50 and 17.50, the call we sold expires worthless, while the call we bought will have value equal to the difference between the stock price and the strike price; 12.50 in this case. Where is the break even? Well we paid 1.31 for the option spread, so if its exactly 1.31 higher then 12.50 (13.81), then well be at break even if the stock is at that point.

    That gives us an amazing return of 281% if GE is above 17.50, for an annualized return of 107% (holding period is 22 months). Because of the high potential for risk – a complete loss of investment if GE is below 12.50 in Jan 2011, you shouldn’t put more then you’re willing to risk in the trade. Definitely a high risk, high reward play. Yet with how much time there is, its a much surer bet then short term options, and much more profitable then just buying the shares.

    So now that the basic idea is covered, what are some examples of vertical spreads I would consider? I’m a strong believer in investing in emerging markets, so I am long term bullish on EEM (IShares MSCI Emerging Markets Investment Index). The January 2011 25-30 vertical on EEM is only going for about $1.88 at the moment, with EEM trading at 25.30 so I think that would be an excellent investment. Above 30 it would be worth $5 at expiration, while below 25 it would be worthless. Unless the economy stays bad until then, I can not imagine that occurring.

    Along the same lines, I expect FXI (iShares FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index) to go up. The “China miracle” isn’t over, merely in a subdued state due to temporarily reduced demand. The 30-35 vertical Jan 11 vertical would be worth $5 at expiration if FXI is above 35, which from its current price of 28.51, isn’t much of a stretch. That vertical spread currently has a $2 price, so that would be an even 150% return from now until January 2011.

    An infinitely more controversial play would be Bank of America. While the trader in me screams to short the stock, I foresee it being far more valuable then it currently is a couple years down the road. The simple reason is that yes; the financial sector has been hammered by the current collapse. Yes, some banking companies have went bankrupt, or have been on the verge of bankruptcy. Is the financial system going to completely collapse? No. Are out of control bank runs going to drive them out of business? No. Are people going to want to borrow money again after this recession ends? YES! Is pent up demand in housing going to cause a rush to buy houses at prices not seen in a decade? YES! Are banks going to profit from this? Most DEFINITELY. If BAC is above $10 at the January 2011 expiration, the 7.50-10 vertical for Jan 2011 would be worth 2.50, while only costing about $0.65. That would give a 286% return, or 108% annualized. The risk of course, is that BAC goes bankrupt, or BAC stays under the $7.50 per share mark past January 2011. In either case, you would lose your investment. Yet with prices as low as they are now, that isn’t very likely.

    For many people, the stock market is not the place to make a quick buck. While some short term traders will have tremendous success with these option strategies, long term investors should use these same strategies while remaining focused on the longer term, to achieve gains vastly exceeding those of the regular stock market, while limiting risk.

    About the Author:

     
  • Absolving Investment Property Managerial Woes

    Layla Vanderbilt 9:20 am on August 17, 2009 | 0 Permalink
    Tags: , , , , , , real estate management, , rental management,

    Managing investment property is not simple. You worry concerning the maintenance, and receiving rent payments. The broken appliances happen at odd hours and solving occupant complaints takes up valuable time. It takes additional of their time and currency to maintain. Unluckily, investors quick become weighed behind as the investment maintenance is additional work than predictable. The solution for a lot of investors, then, is to hire a reputable property management company to take above managing the property.

    An excellent property management company frees the investor?s time and keeps excellent records and maintenance in the property. Hiring a company to manage the property will modernize your business if they present the services you need at an approved upon cost. So, what should you consider if you are interested in hiring a manager for your property?

    One important fact you want to know is how much the company fees are. The national average is around 4 percent on the income from a large rental property, while single homes are often over 12 percent. Be aware of the fees charged, the necessary cost schedule and what services are included before you sign an agreement and exchange some cash. Do they deduct their cost from the monthly rent collected? Spend several times finding out how they deal with additional expenses as fine. Will they send invoices to you to be paid and other expenses in their fee?

    Request them concerning additional properties they have managed. Get the addresses of a couple and check them out. Drive by them to see the type of outside work they do. The management you hire should be recognizable with the type of investment you own. In more words, a manager educated in apartment buildings probably wouldn?t be an excellent match for a single family home property.

    Good communication is good business, so speak with the person who will actually be dealing with the property. Poor communication early in the business relationship can lead to hassles in the future. Be sure to get references from the company’s previous clients. The property management company also deals with advertising, so take a look at their previous advertising work and ask about advertising costs. Costs will differ between newspapers, television and the internet. Ask about a website, and check out its ease of use and if a prospective tenant can apply online.

    Some property management companies hire contractors for work such as landscape, repair and preparing vacancies. Be sure to find out whether or not they cover these needs and how quickly they can cover them. Time is valuable, so their speed and efficiency is important to consider. Tenants may find themselves in an emergency at any time of the day, so find out the hours that the property management company is available. Location relative to the investment property is also important, so find out how far the management office is from the investment property. Some offices are located within a commercial building. How quickly the company can respond to complaints is important in terms of keeping tenants, so find a company that is located close to the investment property.

    A life of an investor can be very busy, and hiring a property management company can streamline the investor’s business. The work that a property management company handles can be more than what an investor can handle. With the property managed, the owner can look into other investments. Just be sure to do your research before hiring so you can guarantee quality work.

    About the Author:

     
  • Characteristics of Day Trading Stocks

    Sheryl Bocelli 10:40 am on August 8, 2009 | 0 Permalink
    Tags: , , , , , day trading stocks, , , , , , ,

    In day trading, it is important for the trader to know each market and the bonds, commodities or securities at stake. These goods can be found anywhere and they are to be traded within the same trading day in a particular market. The stock exchange is a very wide business world. It is composed of different sectors depending on the type of market.

    Thorough understanding of the systems in particular market and the basic knowledge of stock charts applicable for that particular sector is very helpful. You must understand that learning the types of stocks and the strategies as well as the charts that you need for your style of trade execution is very important. The trader or investor must study carefully the movements of the price for mere speculation is not very helpful when dealing with different markets.

    If you find fast-moving commodities it only means that they are saleable and implies liquidity. When a stock is liquid, you can surely make good profit and you will have a quick entry and exit in the market when you deal with liquid commodities. The characteristics of liquidity in a stock would diminish the spread and slippage of your trade execution. Always aim at liquid day trading stocks when you trade.

    The intelligent speculations are likewise vital in cases of commodities like these. The more volatile the stocks are, the more they can move quickly and you likewise get quick profits. The up and down trends in the market is due to volatility of the price at stake which is important for day trading stocks.

    It must be reminded, however, that day trading can be extremely risky for some traders. It can lead to financial breakdowns within a short period of time. That is also the reason why it is very important to find the best strategy that suits your trading style with the proper education.

    To check online is just additional information but the move is up to the trader if he can profit or not. You need a support from a day trading software to address your concern. The software is your guide in the proper choice of day trading stocks.

    About the Author:

     
  • CFDs Versus Stock

    Jeff Cartridge 2:12 am on August 8, 2009 | 0 Permalink
    Tags: , , , cfds, cfds versus stock, cfds vs stock, contracts for difference, , , , , , , stock vs cfds, , trading stocks

    Many people ask what is the best instrument to trade and the answer to that is dependent on what it is that the trader wants to achieve. Today we will take a look at CFDs vs Stock and weigh up the advantages and disadvantages of each.

    Cash Is Not Essential

    When buying stock it is necessary to have all of the cash to purchase the stock. While it is possible to reduce this requirement by using margin loans at the very best you will be required to have 30 – 40% of the value of the underlying stock in cash.

    When trading CFDs very little cash is required. With margin requirements from as little as 3% for stocks a small amount of money controls a much larger position. The potential for profit is very strong because of the leverage that is used and returns can be 10 times that which you would make with stocks.

    So for efficient use of capital and profit potential in the battle of CFDs vs Stock, CFDs win hands down.

    What Happens When It Doesn’t Work?

    The other side of leverage is risk as leverage amplifies both gains and losses. The most you can lose when investing in stocks is 100% of your capital, assuming you have not borrowed any money to invest.

    It is possible to lose more than 100% of the money you invested in the first place with CFDs, so risk management is very important.

    It is much easier to manage your risk when you are trading stock than when you are trading CFDs. The leverage available when trading CFDs makes this a much more challenging undertaking as losses can add up very quickly.

    What Does It Cost?

    There are two costs to consider when comparing CFD vs stock, finance charges and brokerage. It will depend on who your broker is, but brokerage on CFDs is usually cheaper with rates from 0.08%.

    Interest costs do not apply to stocks, but because CFDs are leveraged, interest charges do apply.

    It will depend on the balance between higher interest costs and lower CFD brokerage costs as to which is cheaper CFDs vs stock. The longer a position is held the advantage will swing in favour of the stock holder.

    The Impact of Tax

    When CFDs were created they allowed institutional traders to avoid stamp duty charges associated with stock purchases.

    In Australia CFDs are taxed differently to stock as the capital gains tax regime does not apply to CFDs, so there is no exemption for holding CFDs for 12 months or more. Franking credits also do not apply when receiving dividends associated with CFDs. Stocks may have a tax advantage in Australia.

    Tax advantages vary dramatically from country to country so it is hard to call a definitive ruling here in the battle of CFDs vs stock.

    Conclusion, Which is Better?

    There is no clear advantage to CFDs vs stock as it does depend on what your preferences are. CFDs give you access to greater gains and losses, so if you are able to effectively manage you risk then trading CFDs could give you an edge. Stocks on the other hand can survive more volatile times with less impact on the account and risk management is easier.

    From a cost perspective CFDs may have an advantage due to low transaction costs, but this advantage can disappear if CFDs are held for long periods of time as interest charges accrue. In conclusion I personally like the access to leverage that CFDs provide and I actively manage my risk to control the impact of leverage on my portfolio.

    About the Author:

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel